<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam from Mythbusters talks about Speed Booster and NEX cameras.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrien S</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-192684</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrien S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16844#comment-192684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a huge mistake made by many people about &quot;aperture&quot;.

In the video they say they will get the feel of a 85/1 with this adapter and a 85/1.4 on a Nex, and that is totally wrong.
You will get the image a 85/1.4 gives you on a full frame. With a f/1 setting for speed, that&#039;s true, but definitely not a 85/1 image look depth-of-field wise.


Just like putting a 50/1.4 on a 1.5 crop sensor won&#039;t make the photographs look like the ones taken by a full frame 75/1.4, but a 75/2 instead, regarding image looks and depth of field. And a 1.4 lense regarding speed, that&#039;s true.



The aperture that gives you the &quot;quantity of light arriving on sensor per surface units&quot; (and so the speed/iso/aperture combination you need in a specific situation) is NOT the same as the aperture that gives you the depth of field you get on a specific setup, if you change sensor.


A x2 teleconverter does change both apertures, because you keep the same sensor. But here, you try to compare things with different sensors, and that&#039;s why the two apertures aren&#039;t linked any more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a huge mistake made by many people about &#8220;aperture&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the video they say they will get the feel of a 85/1 with this adapter and a 85/1.4 on a Nex, and that is totally wrong.<br />
You will get the image a 85/1.4 gives you on a full frame. With a f/1 setting for speed, that&#8217;s true, but definitely not a 85/1 image look depth-of-field wise.</p>
<p>Just like putting a 50/1.4 on a 1.5 crop sensor won&#8217;t make the photographs look like the ones taken by a full frame 75/1.4, but a 75/2 instead, regarding image looks and depth of field. And a 1.4 lense regarding speed, that&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>The aperture that gives you the &#8220;quantity of light arriving on sensor per surface units&#8221; (and so the speed/iso/aperture combination you need in a specific situation) is NOT the same as the aperture that gives you the depth of field you get on a specific setup, if you change sensor.</p>
<p>A x2 teleconverter does change both apertures, because you keep the same sensor. But here, you try to compare things with different sensors, and that&#8217;s why the two apertures aren&#8217;t linked any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChenAlan</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-191904</link>
		<dc:creator>ChenAlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16844#comment-191904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all his goofyness in Mythbusters, my respect for Adam Savage has just gone up insanely high.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all his goofyness in Mythbusters, my respect for Adam Savage has just gone up insanely high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klipsen</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-191564</link>
		<dc:creator>Klipsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16844#comment-191564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but for use on photo cameras, the technology was apparently patented by Kodak, who never manufactured the product, nor would allow anyone else to do so.

I&#039;ve argued for Sony to start making them for years, because it would turn their APS-C cameras into full frame cameras, increase lens speed and potentially lens resolution.

Front mounted converters reduce image quality, rear mounted converters may actually improve it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but for use on photo cameras, the technology was apparently patented by Kodak, who never manufactured the product, nor would allow anyone else to do so.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve argued for Sony to start making them for years, because it would turn their APS-C cameras into full frame cameras, increase lens speed and potentially lens resolution.</p>
<p>Front mounted converters reduce image quality, rear mounted converters may actually improve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alf</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-191387</link>
		<dc:creator>Alf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16844#comment-191387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It gives the same DoF as on FF because you get the same aperture for almost the same focal lenght (x1.08 crop instead of x1.5 crop). 
And that&#039;s what defines DoF, not the size of the sensor per se.

Imagine a 100mm f/1 full frame lens.
On an APS-C NEX with speedbooster, this lens will become a 108mm f/1.08
Pretty close isn&#039;t it ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It gives the same DoF as on FF because you get the same aperture for almost the same focal lenght (x1.08 crop instead of x1.5 crop).<br />
And that&#8217;s what defines DoF, not the size of the sensor per se.</p>
<p>Imagine a 100mm f/1 full frame lens.<br />
On an APS-C NEX with speedbooster, this lens will become a 108mm f/1.08<br />
Pretty close isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/adam-for-mythbusters-talks-about-speed-booster-and-nex-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-191288</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16844#comment-191288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The speed booster can&#039;t get faster than 0.9 because of the size of the entrance pupil. So 1.2 lenses will be as fast as a 1 or a 0.95]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed booster can&#8217;t get faster than 0.9 because of the size of the entrance pupil. So 1.2 lenses will be as fast as a 1 or a 0.95</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 9/24 queries in 0.008 seconds using apc
Object Caching 328/340 objects using apc

 Served from: sonyalpharumors.com @ 2013-05-21 22:21:49 by W3 Total Cache -->