<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jackar 34mm f/1.8 lens now in Stock and shipping via eBay.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rawit</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-174323</link>
		<dc:creator>Rawit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 09:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=15706#comment-174323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at those pics on Flickr, it seems that corner sharpness is indeed quite bad on a NEX... Like MC stated, don&#039;t go for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at those pics on Flickr, it seems that corner sharpness is indeed quite bad on a NEX&#8230; Like MC stated, don&#8217;t go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-174273</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=15706#comment-174273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think the Slr Magic 35mm 1.4 for $350 would be a better deal to match 35mm 1.8 IQ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the Slr Magic 35mm 1.4 for $350 would be a better deal to match 35mm 1.8 IQ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mc</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-174251</link>
		<dc:creator>mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=15706#comment-174251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin has stated the truth already. It is in fact a cheapo CCTV lens which can barely cover the APS-C sensor. The focal plane is not flat enough that it can&#039;t get a sharp enough image across the frame until you shrink the aperture to f/11 or smaller. Some copy may not be good as it can&#039;t focus correctly on certain distance. The only merit is that the center image quality is relative good and is faithful to the original color. It may be a good toy for $25 USD with adapter. But never try to have one for $189. You are fool if you get one.
The hood is made by plastic and the letter on the lens is made by printing. Don&#039;t go for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin has stated the truth already. It is in fact a cheapo CCTV lens which can barely cover the APS-C sensor. The focal plane is not flat enough that it can&#8217;t get a sharp enough image across the frame until you shrink the aperture to f/11 or smaller. Some copy may not be good as it can&#8217;t focus correctly on certain distance. The only merit is that the center image quality is relative good and is faithful to the original color. It may be a good toy for $25 USD with adapter. But never try to have one for $189. You are fool if you get one.<br />
The hood is made by plastic and the letter on the lens is made by printing. Don&#8217;t go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sekiz</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-174213</link>
		<dc:creator>Sekiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 22:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=15706#comment-174213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am seriously considering this. How do you guys think would it compare to Sony E 35 f1.8 OSS in terms of optical performance only disregarding aspects like AF and price?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am seriously considering this. How do you guys think would it compare to Sony E 35 f1.8 OSS in terms of optical performance only disregarding aspects like AF and price?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/jackar-34mm-f1-8-lens-now-in-stock-and-shipping-via-ebay/comment-page-1/#comment-174158</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 13:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=15706#comment-174158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another overpriced remake of the 35/1.7 Fujian. 
My God... &quot;With its f1.8 ultra-large aperture&quot;  

mhhhh, f/1.8 - ultra-large my a$$  :&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another overpriced remake of the 35/1.7 Fujian.<br />
My God&#8230; &#8220;With its f1.8 ultra-large aperture&#8221;  </p>
<p>mhhhh, f/1.8 &#8211; ultra-large my a$$  :&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 11/20 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 329/333 objects using apc

 Served from: sonyalpharumors.com @ 2013-05-24 16:54:59 by W3 Total Cache -->