<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma 30mm and 19mm lens tested at Photozone.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lancaster</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/comment-page-1/#comment-191311</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Lancaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 05:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16818#comment-191311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I am the biggest fan then Sony is in trouble because only 1 of my top 5 lenses is a Sony. 
Voigtlander Nokton 35/1.4
Rokinon 8/2.8 fisheye
Contax G 90/2.8
Canon FDn 50/1.4
And my Zeiss 24. 
I have the SEL 50/1.8 and 55-210 and have no desire to buy any other Sony Emount lens available. I want a FF camera but the A99&#039;s price and low light performance compared to peers turned me off. I tried the RX1 and the AF disappointed me. So biggest Sony fan seems erroneous. 

I hated the manual focus ring on the Sigma 30. It was not smooth at all even when using DMF; it was jerky and would stick. That was enough for me to send it back. I also didn&#039;t like the CA and f/2.8 wasn&#039;t fast enough for shooting in the low light of my house.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I am the biggest fan then Sony is in trouble because only 1 of my top 5 lenses is a Sony.<br />
Voigtlander Nokton 35/1.4<br />
Rokinon 8/2.8 fisheye<br />
Contax G 90/2.8<br />
Canon FDn 50/1.4<br />
And my Zeiss 24.<br />
I have the SEL 50/1.8 and 55-210 and have no desire to buy any other Sony Emount lens available. I want a FF camera but the A99&#8242;s price and low light performance compared to peers turned me off. I tried the RX1 and the AF disappointed me. So biggest Sony fan seems erroneous. </p>
<p>I hated the manual focus ring on the Sigma 30. It was not smooth at all even when using DMF; it was jerky and would stick. That was enough for me to send it back. I also didn&#8217;t like the CA and f/2.8 wasn&#8217;t fast enough for shooting in the low light of my house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spada</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/comment-page-1/#comment-191081</link>
		<dc:creator>spada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16818#comment-191081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For $99, I can&#039;t complain.  I should get my 30mm in the mail today or tomorrow.  Like all new Sigma lenses, it has great center resolution, which is perfect for people pictures.  I&#039;m glad Sigma focuses on getting super sharp centers right from wide open.  sharp corners are for pixel peepers and generally not needed]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For $99, I can&#8217;t complain.  I should get my 30mm in the mail today or tomorrow.  Like all new Sigma lenses, it has great center resolution, which is perfect for people pictures.  I&#8217;m glad Sigma focuses on getting super sharp centers right from wide open.  sharp corners are for pixel peepers and generally not needed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peevee</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/comment-page-1/#comment-191054</link>
		<dc:creator>peevee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 12:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16818#comment-191054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[19 has bad sides and very bad corners on Sony, but I goess on m43 it is good across the frame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19 has bad sides and very bad corners on Sony, but I goess on m43 it is good across the frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/comment-page-1/#comment-190997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16818#comment-190997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was going to order these today from technikdirekt, but they dont ship to Greece...pretty much to every other EU country except Greece. I wonder why they chose to skip them from their shipping services?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was going to order these today from technikdirekt, but they dont ship to Greece&#8230;pretty much to every other EU country except Greece. I wonder why they chose to skip them from their shipping services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sigma-30mm-tested-at-photozone/comment-page-1/#comment-190995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 08:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16818#comment-190995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accoridng to this review and summary, there is no difference in the original 30 and 19 than from the new ones just released other than the smooth versus ribbed exterior...Why would I wait or spend more for the new version if only interested in looks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accoridng to this review and summary, there is no difference in the original 30 and 19 than from the new ones just released other than the smooth versus ribbed exterior&#8230;Why would I wait or spend more for the new version if only interested in looks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 8/19 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 339/343 objects using memcached

 Served from: sonyalpharumors.com @ 2013-06-19 06:53:55 by W3 Total Cache -->