<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some details about the Sony mirrorless camera&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:23:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>It does, but only because the image is divorced from the camera back. If you check a pic of the camera back itself, you&#039;ll see how it is just like a non-touch-screen cell phone.

But maybe the next iteration of the camera will have touch. It is certainly within Sony&#039;s ability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does, but only because the image is divorced from the camera back. If you check a pic of the camera back itself, you&#8217;ll see how it is just like a non-touch-screen cell phone.</p>
<p>But maybe the next iteration of the camera will have touch. It is certainly within Sony&#8217;s ability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulaney</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Will, I am not at all sure this isn&#039;t a touch screen; it certainly looks like one to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, I am not at all sure this isn&#8217;t a touch screen; it certainly looks like one to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>Ken, then don&#039;t get it. Sheesh. So negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, then don&#8217;t get it. Sheesh. So negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>It would be far more brilliant if it was a software driven special effect that blended in. Dummy cartoon graphic on an expensive camera, whats the point, compact users are perfectly happy with just that, compact ixus cameras. This cam is not compact at all if you have a lens on it, so what is the point, I would much rather buy a superior compact like LX3 or the new Samsung F1.8 than this one. A3xx &amp; A5xx ftw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be far more brilliant if it was a software driven special effect that blended in. Dummy cartoon graphic on an expensive camera, whats the point, compact users are perfectly happy with just that, compact ixus cameras. This cam is not compact at all if you have a lens on it, so what is the point, I would much rather buy a superior compact like LX3 or the new Samsung F1.8 than this one. A3xx &amp; A5xx ftw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>Rob - it&#039;s just about opening/closing aperture.
They named it this way so that compact owners would know what&#039;s this all about - I know few people who have the PASM compact cameras yet have no idea that they can get defocused background by just switching the mode and clicking the button. So Sony solved the problem - brilliant in it&#039;s simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8211; it&#8217;s just about opening/closing aperture.<br />
They named it this way so that compact owners would know what&#8217;s this all about &#8211; I know few people who have the PASM compact cameras yet have no idea that they can get defocused background by just switching the mode and clicking the button. So Sony solved the problem &#8211; brilliant in it&#8217;s simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>Yup, it&#039;s just their way of saying &quot;shallow depth of field&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, it&#8217;s just their way of saying &#8220;shallow depth of field&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s &quot;background defocus&quot;? Is it just changing the aperture or is it a software-driven special effect, ie detecting blur and exaggerating it or something? Would be interesting to see how that would work, vs genuine shallow DOF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s &#8220;background defocus&#8221;? Is it just changing the aperture or is it a software-driven special effect, ie detecting blur and exaggerating it or something? Would be interesting to see how that would work, vs genuine shallow DOF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>Not a touch screen -- the curved &quot;sweep&quot; area on the right mirrors the large button-dial-thing on the physical camera. And the on-screen buttons in the upper right and lower right corners of the screen mirror physical buttons also.

But still, a very nice menu layout!!!

And that flash icon proves that there is indeed a swing-up flash on this camera, even if Sony has not shown it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a touch screen &#8212; the curved &#8220;sweep&#8221; area on the right mirrors the large button-dial-thing on the physical camera. And the on-screen buttons in the upper right and lower right corners of the screen mirror physical buttons also.</p>
<p>But still, a very nice menu layout!!!</p>
<p>And that flash icon proves that there is indeed a swing-up flash on this camera, even if Sony has not shown it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>This new mount...do anyone think Sigma or Tamron will release lenses to it in the future?, and why is the believed price tag so high, you would think throwing out the mirrorbox and shrink the whole thing would make it cheaper instead!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This new mount&#8230;do anyone think Sigma or Tamron will release lenses to it in the future?, and why is the believed price tag so high, you would think throwing out the mirrorbox and shrink the whole thing would make it cheaper instead!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/some-details-about-the-sony-mirrorless-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-1017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1611#comment-1017</guid>
		<description>FH may mean Full HD movie format (not filters): that should be seen anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FH may mean Full HD movie format (not filters): that should be seen anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 820/843 objects using xcache

Served from: www.sonyalpharumors.com @ 2012-02-11 07:44:04 -->
