<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony A99 image samples (including first Black and White test)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DJsolo</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/comment-page-1/#comment-160245</link>
		<dc:creator>DJsolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 01:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=14572#comment-160245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aaron I shoot 3 weddings per weekend with my A850s. I always shoot my reception at iso800-1600, F4-5.6, 1/60th, with my F58 at 1/16 - 1/8 in concert with off-camera flashes. The noise hardly exists on my properly exposed photographs, and many of my clients order them as gallery wraps, and they look great in their italian hand-made albums. What load are you smoking? In comparison my partner&#039;s images from his D700 have a yellow tinge (nikon tungsten has never looked great) and his skin tones always require a lot more retouching... and man that canon banding, it looks like all the pictures were printed on a printer with low ink. 

Seriously. Looking forward to the A99, as the A850 already does fantastic for me (and many others who have a fucking clue how to shoot)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaron I shoot 3 weddings per weekend with my A850s. I always shoot my reception at iso800-1600, F4-5.6, 1/60th, with my F58 at 1/16 &#8211; 1/8 in concert with off-camera flashes. The noise hardly exists on my properly exposed photographs, and many of my clients order them as gallery wraps, and they look great in their italian hand-made albums. What load are you smoking? In comparison my partner&#8217;s images from his D700 have a yellow tinge (nikon tungsten has never looked great) and his skin tones always require a lot more retouching&#8230; and man that canon banding, it looks like all the pictures were printed on a printer with low ink. </p>
<p>Seriously. Looking forward to the A99, as the A850 already does fantastic for me (and many others who have a fucking clue how to shoot)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neia</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/comment-page-1/#comment-160227</link>
		<dc:creator>neia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=14572#comment-160227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; game over&quot;... 
it&#039;s not over yet..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; game over&#8221;&#8230;<br />
it&#8217;s not over yet..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flo</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/comment-page-1/#comment-160052</link>
		<dc:creator>Flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 04:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=14572#comment-160052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tested the A99 at a photo exhibition in Kuala Lumpur.
It looks like a a77, cheap plastic feeling, and autofocus cannot compare with D800 which is at almost the same price now. And the d800 is sooo much nicer than the D600.

so I bought the d800 after using Minolta/sony for 17 years, including Dynax 9 and A900. I will miss the EVF and the LCD screen
Game over]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested the A99 at a photo exhibition in Kuala Lumpur.<br />
It looks like a a77, cheap plastic feeling, and autofocus cannot compare with D800 which is at almost the same price now. And the d800 is sooo much nicer than the D600.</p>
<p>so I bought the d800 after using Minolta/sony for 17 years, including Dynax 9 and A900. I will miss the EVF and the LCD screen<br />
Game over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiman</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/comment-page-1/#comment-159999</link>
		<dc:creator>saiman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=14572#comment-159999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again.. poor sharpness in almost all of them.

I&#039;m still waiting to see one crisp sharp image from a99 at the full original resolution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again.. poor sharpness in almost all of them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still waiting to see one crisp sharp image from a99 at the full original resolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin B.</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-a99-image-samples-including-first-black-and-white-test/comment-page-1/#comment-159983</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=14572#comment-159983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noise free is not the issue, but up to the competition would be nice..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noise free is not the issue, but up to the competition would be nice..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 10/24 queries in 0.008 seconds using apc
Object Caching 328/340 objects using apc

 Served from: sonyalpharumors.com @ 2013-05-21 23:52:55 by W3 Total Cache -->