<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony RX100 kaputt!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-rx100-kaputt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-rx100-kaputt/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-rx100-kaputt/comment-page-1/#comment-180859</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 02:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16205#comment-180859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know how Sony measured specs for this camera? I don&#039;t mean to be anally retentive, but it seems to me that Sony marketing department needs to take basic geometry classes... Check this out, from Sony&#039;s website:
Imaging Sensor : 1.0&quot; (13.2 x 8.8mm)
Now, by Pythagorean Theorem, that would mean that this sensor is 15.9mm diagonally. 1.0&quot; = 25.4mm. Could someone please explain how 13.2mm or 15.9mm = 25.4mm? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how Sony measured specs for this camera? I don&#8217;t mean to be anally retentive, but it seems to me that Sony marketing department needs to take basic geometry classes&#8230; Check this out, from Sony&#8217;s website:<br />
Imaging Sensor : 1.0&#8243; (13.2 x 8.8mm)<br />
Now, by Pythagorean Theorem, that would mean that this sensor is 15.9mm diagonally. 1.0&#8243; = 25.4mm. Could someone please explain how 13.2mm or 15.9mm = 25.4mm? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen G.</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-rx100-kaputt/comment-page-1/#comment-180730</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16205#comment-180730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job, barbarian! I like it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, barbarian! I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-rx100-kaputt/comment-page-1/#comment-180659</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 09:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/?p=16205#comment-180659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impressive how they fit everything inside. RX1 and RX100 are definitely breakthroughs. Btw, that is the best looking grip I&#039;ve seen to date.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impressive how they fit everything inside. RX1 and RX100 are definitely breakthroughs. Btw, that is the best looking grip I&#8217;ve seen to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 8/17 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc
Object Caching 294/296 objects using apc

 Served from: sonyalpharumors.com @ 2013-05-24 18:51:53 by W3 Total Cache -->