<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (SR3) IMPORTANT UPDATE -&gt; New Sony mirrorless camera specs? The Sony E-series!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/</link>
	<description>Sony Digital Camera News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyalpharumors &#124; Home</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-19835</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyalpharumors &#124; Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-19835</guid>
		<description>[...] here to read that article) On february 10 2010 we were the first to unveil the NEX specs and name! (Click here to read that article). We were the first to post pictures of the NEX cameras two weeks before their announcement (Click [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here to read that article) On february 10 2010 we were the first to unveil the NEX specs and name! (Click here to read that article). We were the first to post pictures of the NEX cameras two weeks before their announcement (Click [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony planea lanzar una EVIL: ¿rumor o está al caer?</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-12927</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony planea lanzar una EVIL: ¿rumor o está al caer?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-12927</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; SonyAlphaRumors     MMM.MAX_show(&#039;CP3&#039;);        1     me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | SonyAlphaRumors     MMM.MAX_show(&#039;CP3&#039;);        1     me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony reveals concept photos for MFT competitor..</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony reveals concept photos for MFT competitor..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-862</guid>
		<description>[...] SonyAlphaRumors:  The rumored specs are from a new source (also take it easy ok?). The source told me he read the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SonyAlphaRumors:  The rumored specs are from a new source (also take it easy ok?). The source told me he read the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony planea lanzar una EVIL: Â¿rumor o estÃ¡ al caer? &#124; Ultimos Avances</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony planea lanzar una EVIL: Â¿rumor o estÃ¡ al caer? &#124; Ultimos Avances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-766</guid>
		<description>[...] VÃ­a &#124; SonyAlphaRumors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VÃ­a | SonyAlphaRumors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonys E-Serie: NEX3 &#38; NEX5 &#124; LongLenses.de</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonys E-Serie: NEX3 &#38; NEX5 &#124; LongLenses.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-666</guid>
		<description>[...] sonyalpharumors.com &#160;Powered by Max Banner Ads&#160;    Tags: Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Serie, Sony NEX3, Sony NEX5     [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sonyalpharumors.com &nbsp;Powered by Max Banner Ads&nbsp;    Tags: Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Serie, Sony NEX3, Sony NEX5     [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfisher</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>kingfisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-661</guid>
		<description>sony come with three</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sony come with three</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zek</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>zek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-653</guid>
		<description>@Andrew Anderson

I agree on glas in adapter topic.
Another problem is the manual aperture on A-Mount.

@eerikoo

Alpha Mount Camera will never be as small as micro 4/3s camera.
With this (if it happens that way) Sony can make very small cameras but have bigger sensor than the m4/3s.
The m4/3s got a really good hit on the market and took some of the DSLR entry level market share!

The adapter is useful to extend the lens range with upper Grade glass.
On the other side many DSLR users like to have a small P&amp;S camera with them.
Using the owned A-Mount glass with it, can&#039;t be a bad thing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew Anderson</p>
<p>I agree on glas in adapter topic.<br />
Another problem is the manual aperture on A-Mount.</p>
<p>@eerikoo</p>
<p>Alpha Mount Camera will never be as small as micro 4/3s camera.<br />
With this (if it happens that way) Sony can make very small cameras but have bigger sensor than the m4/3s.<br />
The m4/3s got a really good hit on the market and took some of the DSLR entry level market share!</p>
<p>The adapter is useful to extend the lens range with upper Grade glass.<br />
On the other side many DSLR users like to have a small P&amp;S camera with them.<br />
Using the owned A-Mount glass with it, can&#8217;t be a bad thing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerikoo</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>eerikoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-650</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really stupid if you have to buy a pricey adapter to use the A lenses you already have, this does not make any sense to me, and besides the lenses you buy for the E mount can never be used on an Alpha A mount. Well looks like ill stick to mirror then, good things comes with a backside..plus now they will probably never put video on the A5xx class of DSLR&#039;s either in the future.

What is the point of making a whole new system line for an APS-C sensor?, instead they could have used this opportunity to make a a330 type of body without mirror and video, no need for MLU either. So that&#039;s why I don&#039;t believe this at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really stupid if you have to buy a pricey adapter to use the A lenses you already have, this does not make any sense to me, and besides the lenses you buy for the E mount can never be used on an Alpha A mount. Well looks like ill stick to mirror then, good things comes with a backside..plus now they will probably never put video on the A5xx class of DSLR&#8217;s either in the future.</p>
<p>What is the point of making a whole new system line for an APS-C sensor?, instead they could have used this opportunity to make a a330 type of body without mirror and video, no need for MLU either. So that&#8217;s why I don&#8217;t believe this at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-649</guid>
		<description>E-Mount should be true and there must an adapter to use current A-Mount lenses. Otherwise you can not use current lenses if they remove the mirror. I believe Sony will not place sensor bit behind to use the current lenses without an adapter. the camera will not be contact in that case.The question is whether there will be any glass on the adapter or not.  If there is glass, you gonna loose light and sharpness (however small it is) irrespective of the quality of the glass. If this is true, this camera will not gain popularity among current alpha users, even i will not buy them. Otherwise, with no glass, this guy will be popular. I have no idea if there is any limitation using no glass in the adapter or not. There may be some diffraction effect, if we do not use any glass which i am not sure, it depends on how they make it. Lets see.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E-Mount should be true and there must an adapter to use current A-Mount lenses. Otherwise you can not use current lenses if they remove the mirror. I believe Sony will not place sensor bit behind to use the current lenses without an adapter. the camera will not be contact in that case.The question is whether there will be any glass on the adapter or not.  If there is glass, you gonna loose light and sharpness (however small it is) irrespective of the quality of the glass. If this is true, this camera will not gain popularity among current alpha users, even i will not buy them. Otherwise, with no glass, this guy will be popular. I have no idea if there is any limitation using no glass in the adapter or not. There may be some diffraction effect, if we do not use any glass which i am not sure, it depends on how they make it. Lets see&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eerikoo</title>
		<link>http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sr3-new-sony-mirrorless-camera-specs/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>eerikoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonyalpharumors.com/?p=1280#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I hope the E-mount is not true, and I hope the price is not true. Other than that i think it is the camera I&#039;ve been waiting for!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope the E-mount is not true, and I hope the price is not true. Other than that i think it is the camera I&#8217;ve been waiting for!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Object Caching 828/856 objects using xcache

Served from: www.sonyalpharumors.com @ 2012-02-11 06:42:13 -->
