(SR5) New waterhousing reveals the existence of the Sony A390
The Ikelite SLR-DC Housing is now available for the Sony A230, Sony A330
and…(drumming) the Sony A390!
![]()
As we told you 2 days ago, the A390 should be announced soon!
Oh, it is not a typo! Check it out for yourself on…
Technikdirekt
Reefphoto.com
Danish divers
and so on…

Albert
2 years ago |The same a290, same sensor but swivel LCD… and $50 more…
edgar
2 years ago |Which sensor? the old noisy CCD or will it be based on CMOS from a5xx?
ga
2 years ago |dont understand sony in any way, announce so many dummy A3xx, a2xx, etc. series…..what is their point? increase market share? they are flooding the market with cheap DSLRs (many different series) with only slight difference
ieR
2 years ago |could it be just typo of 380 to 390? lol
ieR
2 years ago |u see, 380 were family of 230 and 330… but hope A390 is true, good for new comer who wanted new entry but dont like the A380(grip) (and since the rest of us is waiting for the A7xx)
if u were to google A860 or A840,(or A560) u get plenty of results… typo results
Marcell
2 years ago |It must be a typo! Check the official ikelite page (http://www.ikelite.com/web_pages/camsonchart.html). They offer housing for the A380 that is missing here from the list.
Sony A390 appears in a camera water housing specs | Photo Rumors
2 years ago |[...] first link that was posted on dpreview is already removed, but SonyAlphaRumors found few other website that list a Ikelite SLR-DC Housing for Sony A230, A330 & [...]
Kevin
2 years ago |I think an a390 is entirely probable, but has it occurred to anybody that the same housing could not possibly be used for the a230 and this yet unannounced a390 camera? Due to the very different grip design and placement of the shutter button between the a230 and a290, and the vast similarities between a230, a330 and a380, I think this specification listing is much more likely a typo than anything else.
Erwin
2 years ago |…well… A typo is possible, but in 2 Websites simultaneously?
…and a Typo from a supplier is thinkable, but I don´t think so