Matti Haapoja made a first direct comparison between the two cameras:
Main takeaways:
- Image quality: The Nikon ZR offers more detail, dynamic range, and easier color grading (especially with RED RAW) compared to the FX3. FX3 still wins in H.265 shooting.
- Autofocus: Both are strong, with the ZR marking a breakthrough for RED cameras.
- Slow motion: FX3 has no crop at 4K/120p, but ZR can record 4K/120p in RED RAW — a big advantage.
- Body & usability: FX3 has better mounting points and dual card slots, but ZR counters with a brighter 4” LCD, 32-bit float audio, and lighter design.
- Low light: FX3 is stronger thanks to its 12MP sensor, but ZR is still very capable.
- Price: The ZR is the clear winner, almost half the cost.
- Lenses: Sony has the bigger native lineup, but the ZR can adapt E-mount glass, making switching easier
My own thoughts: The real impressive “feature” of the Nikon Zr is it’s low pricing. This will fore Sony to make a FX3III that is cheaper or with credible much better performance than the Nikon Zr to justify it’s high price tag. I think we will not have a long time to wait until Sony releases the new FX3II to take away the spotlight from the Nikon Zr and Canon C50!
Note: He also made this one correction video: The Nikon ZR is powerful and affordable, but its extreme data rates make it less practical for many users.
