Does Pixel Shifting really work? Can the Pixel Shifting on the Olympus E-M1 Mark 3 Micro Four Thirds or the Sony a7R4 Full Frame match a Fujifilm GFX 100 Medium Format? Does Pixel Shifting make them comparable? See how the Fujifilm GFX 100, the Sony a7R IV and the Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III stack up in this camera comparison.
ProAV compared the two video beast cameras. The Canon 8K performance is surely a stunner. It shows what the future beholds for us. But for now 4K is the reality and in that case the Sony is the clear winner:
Gerald Undone posted his full guide for the Sony a7S III for exposure, picture profiles, dynamic range, color modes, gammas, ETTR, zebras, low light, and S-Log3:
And this is a new A7sIII video by Sidney Diongzon:
So, who is the Sony a7s III for? As you all know, the Sony a7s III is not designed as a photography forward camera. However, it’s still a competent stills shooter. The Sony a7s III is perhaps the closest thing to a great all-rounder for documentarians who shoot video and stills. The same can be said for photojournalists too. The small size of the images (JPEGS are roughly 7MB) are the perfect size to be sent quickly and efficiently to editors. The photos have more than enough detail to be printed in newspapers and magazines, as long as they are not huge. They are also more than good enough to be used online. Modern photojournalists and documentarians need to shoot video too. The Sony a7s III is one of the most versatile cameras around for video production.
I think I never reported about this camera. Freefly is selling this 4K420p high speed E-mount camera for $9,995 on their website. And today Chungdha published this new camera test: