Alex Barrera loves the new Sony RX1rIII because it can go to places where other cameras can’t go!

After all the “hate” let’s also see some positive review of the new Sony RX1rIII. While the camera has faced a mixed reception online, particularly due to its $5,100 price tag, Alex argues that many critics are missing the bigger picture.

The Power of Portability

What sets the RX1 Mark III apart is not just its 61MP full-frame sensor or the Sony 35mm f/2 Zeiss lens—but the fact that all this power fits in a body small enough to slip into a Lululemon fanny pack. For Alex, this meant no camera bag, no sling—just true everyday carry. He took it everywhere: the gym, restaurants, grocery stores, even a nightclub.

This small form factor meant the camera drew zero attention, allowing him to capture moments discreetly in places where larger cameras like his Sony A7CR would have triggered restrictions or suspicion.

While some compare the RX1R III to the Leica Q3 or the Sony A7CR, Alex insists the RX1 stands alone. The Leica may be more polished, but it’s also heavier and bulkier. The A7CR may be more flexible, but it’s not pocketable. The RX1 Mark III offers pro-grade performance in a compact, point-and-shoot-like body, and that’s its magic.

While the price is high, Alex points out that camera prices across the board have increased in 2025. Even the new Ricoh GR IV launched at nearly double the price of its predecessor. Factor in tariffs and inflation, and the RX1’s U.S. pricing isn’t that surprising.

For Alex, the RX1R III is worth it—not just for its specs, but for how it changes the way you shoot. It’s a camera that encourages spontaneity, fits into your life, and gets out of the way—while delivering beautiful results.

Sony RX1rIII in Stock at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Fotoerhardt, Calumet, WexUK.

Manny calls the new Sigma 200mm f/2 the “greatest portrait lens of all time”

Preorders:
Sigma 200mm f/2.0 at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, FotoKoch, FotoErhardt, Calumet, WexUK.
Sigma 12mm f/1.4 at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, FotoKoch, FotoErhardt, Calumet, WexUK.

 

Manny Ortiz actually owns the 17 year old Canon 200mm f/2.0 EF lens and therefore shared an interesting comparison with the new Sigma. For him the Sigma is the “greatest portrait lens of all time”.

Portrait Shooting Experience
– The lens offers incredible compression and subject isolation.
– He recommends shooting from lower angles for more dramatic portraits.
– Effective communication with the model becomes harder due to the long working distance (~40 ft).
– Using foreground elements and proper framing adds depth to the images.

Sports Photography
– Tested at Wrigley Field during a baseball game.
– Autofocus was fast and reliable.
– Outperforms the 70–200mm f/2.8 in background separation and isolation.
– Excellent for isolating players even in busy stadium scenes.

Sigma vs Canon 200mm f/2
– The Sigma is over 1.5 pounds lighter and fits in a standard bag.
– Easier to use handheld; the Canon requires a monopod.
– Sigma priced at $3,299 vs Canon’s $5,700.
– Manny says the Canon has sentimental value but finds the Sigma more practical and inspiring to use.

Downsides
– Requires a lot of space for full-body shots.
– Still heavy; fatigue sets in after extended use.
– Limited to 15 FPS on Sony due to third-party lens limitations.
– Low-angle shooting can lead to composition issues.

Conclusion
This lens isn’t for everyone, but if you want a distinctive portrait look with top-tier optics, it delivers. For Manny, the Sigma 200mm f/2 is a serious alternative to the Canon version—lighter, more usable, and uniquely beautiful. Just be prepared to work for your shots.