First SAL70-400 SSM G II by Gustav (Dyxum).
Click on the image left or right to see the bigger pics. (left orignial pic, right 100% crop).
Gustav posted the first SAL70-400 SSM G II image samples at Dyxum (Click here). He says that “this is a outstanding/superb lens for wildlife/sports , razor-sharp , even with the lens wide open. if you looking for a very good lens that have SSM and personal i think this lens come`s very close near a fixed-lens 300mm/400mm”
Thanks Gustav!
Sony 70-400mm preorders at Amazon (Click here), Adorama (Click here), BHphoto (Click here) and SonyStore USA (via ACDeals).
Randy S.
3 months ago |Kind of over sharpened. Hard to tell if its any good or not.
Peter lai
3 months ago |I am very IMPRESSED of the pictures .It is on my shopping list.Can’t wait for it.
Jonathan S
3 months ago |Looks promising, but I’m dubious that mere coatings could make that much improvement in optics, the remainder of which remain unchanged. I’ll wait for more reviews before I upgrade.
GreenLens
3 months ago |Toleranses and precision are costly but usually pay off.
ruffy
3 months ago |Are you gonna wait for the weather sealed one? lol
SonyCyberPunk
3 months ago |Mere marketing hype. Moving along…
RVN
3 months ago |get away troll
SonyCyberPunk
3 months ago |You mean “Go away troll!”
kalpurush :)
3 months ago |Nice improvements I must say. Good work Sony!
ageha
3 months ago |Can you elaborate on that, please?
john
3 months ago |Pix look very promising.
Gustav is a class act.
I believe his word over anything from Sony marketing.
MO
3 months ago |Gustav is part of Sony marketing and I am glad.
Carl
3 months ago |If so, they should give him a bigger discount.
ageha
3 months ago |Why? He bought it anyway, didn’t he?
Sky_walker
3 months ago |Not yet. Look at the comment below.
Sky_walker
3 months ago |He is?
OnlySony
3 months ago |Ok, but I can do this with my ”old” 70-400 G.
Hellven
3 months ago |yes you can, but 4 times slower
Huh
3 months ago |What source for that claim do you have, other than from Sony?
Sky_walker
3 months ago |ppl who actually own it?
JoeNoName
3 months ago |wow, its so sharp its cutting my eyes. Damn, i would love to get it, shamefully I will never be able to get one in the upcoming 6-10 years T_T
ageha
3 months ago |The posted resolution is way too low to come to your conclusion.
Zohee35
3 months ago |The crops he posted at Dpreview tell enough.
Sky_walker
3 months ago |He got a crops on dyxum.com too – razor sharp
mam
3 months ago |mehhhh with flash even my 70 300 is sharp
FWP
3 months ago |your 70-300 is a joke compared to this lens, particularly with regards to build quality and lens distortion.
Frank
3 months ago |Not wide open it isn’t.
animalsbybarry
3 months ago |Looks good. It would look even better if sony comes out a higher resolution camera to put it on.
Dvir
3 months ago |why are you guys all complaining, add to the 70-400 great optics better focusing and it becomes an amazing lens, should have been weather sealed, but otherwise great stuff.
SonyCyberPunk
3 months ago |It looks no sharper than anything else shrunk down for the web. Not impressed, sorry.
jsmith
3 months ago |I was about to say that I’m not impressed until I went to the blog and saw the other pics. The example posted here is the worst one. Not sure if its the DOF but the feathers look blurred. But the samples on the blog look amazing.
Huh
3 months ago |Clicking on the links and does not seem to be one of your strengths.
gustav
3 months ago |Why not.????
Sky_walker
3 months ago |lol. Nice Hun!
Michele
3 months ago |What do you expect from somebody posting “Mere marketing hype. Moving along…”
Maybe his mouse has some sort of a problem with “left click” combined with some links.
gustav
3 months ago |Sony netherlands loan me this lens, unfortunately the lens. Must back to sony.
But. If i get discount or not, i shall buy this lens, because its a superb lens in his class.
Look on the link to DYXUM and on page on end seven you see picture’s, also 100% crops
Its not only the sharpness that this lens is great, but i notice a improfment to the. AF.
I had also the silver one, and that is also a great lens, , with the silver lens. It has sometime’ problems to get in AF. , when you use some of the other AF points. Than the middle one, now i notice a. Improvement there also
I invited some friends to my house, and try it in the garden. Also with. Bad weather. ! They where impressed.
If you have. The silver one its a very good lens, the last years i make vey good picture’s with it, but the white one is a step better
I have also the SAL 300mm 2.8 ssm g, but i think when i have the new 70-400. The 300mm stay’s in the bag
ArtoS
3 months ago |Thanks Gustav for your valuable info!
I had former silver 70-400 G but sold it because of slow AF for bird photos. I bought new 300/2.8 G II and it has very fast AF, being very happy with it! But it is also heavy (not so heavy as your 500/4 G) to carry all the time in nature. Now thinking to buy for my lighter lens that new 70-400 G II because it has faster AF and a bit better photo quality also compared to older one. But also considering 70-200/2.8 G because it has faster aperture… Have you any hint when Sony is making new 70-200 G II ???
RA
3 months ago |The sharpness at 100% crop is amazing! Looks like a sweet combo for A77′s successor.
gustav
3 months ago |Yes i try this lens on the A77…and i think. It shall works maybe better on the new A58
Frank
3 months ago |If Gustav says it’s fast and sharp then I believe it more than any marketing Sony put out.
gustav
3 months ago |Thank you frank
The lens is improved, in the netherlands it’s in the shop in april, people can see it than for them self.
It’ not only the white paint
Rick
3 months ago |No weather sealing? The typical “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory” move from Sony.
ArtoS
3 months ago |I have used both silver 70-400 G I and 70-200/2.8 G in very demanding conditions and there were no troubles with weather sealing with both of them!
_http://kim.kuvat.fi/kuvat/Jurmo/Jurmo%202008/Jurmo%20-%20marraskuu%202008/Jurmo%2022.11.2008/2008_11_22_Jurmo-75.jpg/_full.jpg
Emir
3 months ago |Holy sh*t!!! Positive news about Alpha stuff! … about ******* time….
Terrance
3 months ago |Having shot several thousands of bird photos with the original version of the 70-400mm I can tell you that it is sharp at all apertures and it is one of the most under rated lenses out there. When I speak of sharpness I am comparing to the Zeiss lineup (I have them all except 500mm) and the 300mm f/2.8 APO. The FL range is very versatile and the SSM is smooth and quick. So if this revised one is better in some way then we have another winner.
GreenLens
3 months ago |If the lens Gustav has was cherry-picked for him by Sony Netherlands, one can safely assume about 20% lower resolution for a lens purchased online.
Frank
3 months ago |The old 70-400mm is already sharp at 400mm f5.6.
Zohee35
3 months ago |With the number of lenses available(only demo models…), I doubt there’s much to cherry pick.
Urmph
3 months ago |What utter non-sense!
leowarnes
3 months ago |Tengo fotos con mi actual 70 400 tan buenas como esas!!!
Randy S.
3 months ago |This image is only sharp from the unsharp mask filter on it. There is ZERO fine detain. Only high contrast edges from the sharpening.
Chris K.
3 months ago |So can anybody clarify whether the optics are any different? I *love* my 70-400 and while improve AF would be nice, improved optics (less ringing bokeh) would be better.
Randy S. – yeah, unsharp mask…like what these guys used to cheat their analysis: http://www.photozone.de/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/432-sony_70400_456
Peter Lai
3 months ago |Hi Chris you can check on the Sonystyle and look up there both lens design.The IQ Sony 70-400mmG1 is better than Nikon and Canon at 400mm. I am sure this G2 is very good too specially they use aspherical lens.