(SR2) A99 (fake?) specs!
Over at Photorumors they published the A99 specs they received from an unkown source. Even Photorumors doesn’t believe the specs are true. So take it easy!
A99
Translucent mirror
36.9 Megapixel 3MOS Exmor sensor
(No Bayer filter)
ISO 100-102400 extendable to 204800 and 409600
12 frames per second
No infrared or anti-alias filters
Digital infrared filtering with three modes NO IR,WITH IR,ONLY IR
In camera moire remove
89 cross-type points AF
Metering direct from sensor
60/1-1/24000sec, time, bulb shutter (focal plane)
Flash synchronization up to 1/500sec and high-speed sync up to 1/24000sec
Built-In GPS and Wi-Fi plus Thunderbolt
Two CompactFlash card slots
Price around €3000
Probably the most interesting aspect are the complete removal from the antialias and infrared filters. My sources may can tell me more about that soon? Thanks!

lifeispixels
11 months ago |ISO 102400 to 409600?!? HOLY MOTHER! I can shoot in a batman cave!!
Jennzhen
11 months ago |Now why would you pissed batman off by shooting in his cave?!
lifeispixels
11 months ago |because I’m Alfred ;P
Fotografo de bodas
11 months ago |Sound like a joke.
Gabriel
11 months ago |Yes, a dreamed camera, SR5 release on april 1 2012
And of course with a 15~80 F2 kit lens and a flash unit with enough power to illuminate entirely the Eiffel Tower
redfern
11 months ago |Translucent mirror — Yes
36.9 Megapixel 3MOS Exmor sensor — Resolution is probably close, but I doubt the Foveon-style sensor will come into play so soon.
ISO 100-102400 extendable to 204800 and 409600 — I believe the 102,400 because the A77 is supposed to already achieve that, but beyond that it’s a bit of wishful thinking.
12 frames per second — Entirely possible with SLT, as long as the buffer can keep up.
No infrared or anti-alias filters — I’ll bite on the lack of an AA filter, because I think that at this resolution you no longer need one even with a Bayer sensor. But the lack of an IR filter seems a bit of a stretch.
Digital infrared filtering with three modes NO IR,WITH IR,ONLY IR — Would be awesome, but I don’t see it happening through software.
In camera moire remove — Why would you need this if you supposedly don’t have a Bayer pattern to create moire? Doubtful.
89 cross-type points AF — Given Sony’s track record with AF, this doesn’t seem likely. I’d think it would be under 50 points, with most of them being assist points.
Metering direct from sensor — Possible.
60/1-1/24000sec, time, bulb shutter (focal plane) — I don’t see this happening. We haven’t even gotten back to the 1/12000 performance of the Maxxum/Dynax 9 film camera, so this seems to be jumping the gun.
Flash synchronization up to 1/500sec and high-speed sync up to 1/24000sec — Also unlikely to be 1/24000.
Built-In GPS and Wi-Fi plus Thunderbolt — Since the A77 is going to use USB 3.0, why would they do an about-face and go with Thunderbolt for this camera?
Two CompactFlash card slots — Possible.
Price around €3000 — Possible, if this is to be the higher-end model of the twin FFs due out next year.
Lee
11 months ago |I am saving money for the coming A99 to help with my A900.
Or maybe i am waiting the FF NEX-9
Jennzhen
11 months ago |“No infrared or anti-alias filters
Digital infrared filtering with three modes NO IR,WITH IR,ONLY IR”
Wheeee … now this is what I call revolutionary (if rumor is true).
Why spend another hundreds of $$ to convert the camera to IR, if manufacturers can provide this superb IR options.
Of course, if Sony does this, I believe there will be all kinds of legal issues, civil rights, etc … so dream-on boys
Might work if Sony can add “clothes/body detection censor” so the IR can only be used for landscape photo and not for perverts
Carl
11 months ago |3MOS, no AA and 1/24000?
Well, if it were true my credit card would explode from my pocket, but I can’t help but feel it’s total BS.
kalpurush :)
11 months ago |Andrea, any update on A-mount lens?
And, a-77?
Sky_walker
11 months ago |I think it doesn’t matter. A-mount is dead anyway.
LOL
David
11 months ago |Troll troll troll your boat…
Sky_walker
11 months ago |David – it’s an irony to recent discussion going on this website.
ledgars
11 months ago |…and what is not mentioned in specs, it will be E-mount camera and all AF points will be on sensor.
roman
11 months ago |I have a dream… but now I must wake up.
explorer76
11 months ago |Some of the specs can be plausible but some are really out of someone’s unreal wish list:
89 cross-type points AF?????? – where will you fit so many cross points in the viewfinder?
1/24000sec ??????
high-speed sync up to 1/24000sec ??? I wonder what teeny tiny fraction of the flash power will you enjoy at that speed?
Thunderbolt????? Sony following apple? no way
Michael
11 months ago |“Metering from sensor” – well, there’s no other way with SLT cameras. The A33/35/55 already do it.
The only way to filter IR digitally is to record IR separately and and at the same time make the other colors insensitive to IR. Then you could mix in/remove IR like any other color. But I don’t see how this could be achieved.
Froo
11 months ago |It could with a Foveon type sensor, as you could add a fourth layer for IR (which penetrates silicon further than RGB light). I’m sure you could subtract the IR “leakage” from the other channels with a bit of software processing, as penetration is linear. So this is probably the only thing that makes sense in this rumor, because this is a novel type of sensor in that case and dreaming it up requires a bit of technical expertise. Of course, I also obviously could be the source of this “rumor” as I knew this
Dy
11 months ago |Hmm, do correct me if I’m wrong. As far as my knowledge of optics goes, penetration or rather, transmission and absorption of light is not linear but an exponential one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmittance
Wirralpix
11 months ago |Fake !!! But Sony have had infrared capabilities on their cameras before. I owned the F717 which had a nightshot mode allowing you to put an R72 filter on the lens and shoot handheld at 1/60 sec. I’ve now got an A200 which is permanently converted to 720nm infrared so I’d love a future camera to have infrared capabilities again.
RDoe
11 months ago |That is just ridiculous, but loose the AA filter, I say thumbs up!
Steve Jones
11 months ago |Surely a complete hoax. Removing the bayer filter would only yield colour with a Foveon type sensor which would mean it wouldn’t be an Exmor-type CMOS sensor as we currently understand the technology. Indeed the removal of the IR filter and in-camera digital filtering for this would imply that the sensor could also detect and distinguish IR from visible – so not just a 3-layer Foveon-type sensor, but a 4-layer one. That’s without getting into the 400K ISO ratings.
In short, the above would require nothing less than a completely revolution in sensor design, not something easy to keep quiet.
I guess the 12 FPS and other specs are technically achievable, albeit at far higher data rates than any other camera out there – I’d calculate at 36MP, 12FPS & 12 bit resolution the data rate off the sensor would be about 650MBps. That’s more than double any DSLR out there.
Basically it’s got fake written all over it.
explorer76
11 months ago |“Surely a complete hoax. Removing the bayer filter would only yield colour with a Foveon type senso ………”
Well theoretically the 3MOS technology can be applied where you use a separate sensor for each color – as is done in the high-end camcorders. This will eliminate the need for bayer filter as well as improve the high-iso performance (as you no longer throw away 2/3rd of the light like conventional bayer arrays). However in reality having 3 FF sensors and the accompanying optical elements in a camera would likely incur a huge cost. And body size plus processing power etc would also cause issues. So it is really in fantasy category at this point.
Steve Jones
11 months ago |It would require 4 sensors – remember the IR has to be separate out. Also, as this is an FF camera then each of the four sensors would have to be FF. Then you’d have to arrange beam splitting four ways. Then it would have to be mated to A-mount. Such a thing would be huge – probably larger than professional multi-sensor video cameras.
Sky_walker
11 months ago |Already an triple sensor camera existed – it wasn’t full frame, true, but never the less it was available on the market. It was Minolta RD175 – with sensor roughly size of 4/3 and used A-mount lenses (!!!!).
here is a picture
explorer76
11 months ago |Well thats what I said as well
That the size and the cost of such a device would be prohibitive and so it seems more a fantasy than reality.
Kiril
11 months ago |Total fake no need to discuss.
Jennzhen
11 months ago |Nah, at least the first 2 lines are likely true
A99
Translucent mirror
Jason
11 months ago |No specs yet of the high-end compact camera that will be announced very soon if I am not mistaken?
SonyA77
11 months ago |Bogus!
WhiteDesertSun
11 months ago |Mostly hope the price is fake!
I want a cheapish FF DSLR!
SRL
11 months ago |Is it Okay if Sony made a cheapish camera for you and also made a camera that was a great photographic tool for serious photographers?
A camera even close to the likely bogus specs post here would be a bargin at $3,000 USD
With the new a77 Sony has the mid-priced market covered better than anyone else.
It’s time for a top of the line replacement for the a900 and a camera that the Nikon D3 and Canon 5 users will flock in mass to purchase.
Rob
11 months ago |I agree that a decent 39 megapixel would be very very cheap at that price. Look at the current cheapest – the Pentax which is about 3X more expensive, and the Leica that is about 10X. Also, the Sony would have much much higher ISO and frame rate – even if it kept A900 specs while upsizing the sensor. WhiteDesert – you better go find a way to get more cash into your photo equipment budget.
Carl
11 months ago |The 645D does have a larger sensor than the A900, so it’s not like its only advantage is resolution.
Spoon
11 months ago |A lot of bogus in there but it would be nice to see the translucent mirror double as IR filter (similar to the patent shown some time ago), sending the IR light to the AF sensor. If they can get that working, they’ll hit two birds with one stone: less light loss for the main sensor, better AF in darker environments.
SRL
11 months ago |I can see Sony doing a camera like this and still not replacing/revamping the lens line-up that came with Minolta purchase.
Just like the NEX product, a nice camera without a proper lens selection.
sopp
11 months ago |3MOS Exmor sensor for next year?
I think it is truly fake rumor.
john
11 months ago |Nothing can beat this rumor:
http://nikonrumors.com/2011/06/02/reality-or-fiction-nikon-d4-d4x-d400-d400x-d800-d800x-d9000-specs.aspx/
jackau
11 months ago |wow.. yeah
must be written after waking up from a wet dream about the camera…
ChenAlan
11 months ago |Sensor made by Nikon…. yeah, keep dreaming. XD
jackau
11 months ago |36 mpx is about right, since if we up scale the 24mpx sensor to Full, thats pretty much where it should hit.
hight end ISO figures are over the top, come on, human eye? at this stage, 6400 at will usable is good enough! Some smart Multi frame can get one ISO level up, will be great, 409600 is.. fantasy.
As for those AF points… do we really need that many? i guess 5X is more than enough…
those flash sync / GPS stuff are possible
CF card slot part is a bit much, what age is this, i dont see the next CF formate take off. I rather get 2 SDXC card than 2 CF card. Given the ram price on the market are as low as they get today, they can easily throw in 512 or even 1GB RAM in the thing as write delay buffer.
The only catch there is battery.
they better throw in 3G, so we can cloud upload the pics… lol
3000 mark would be the one arm with 1GB ram and tri core processor?
i will go for the dual core model with 512 Ram… and plastic body
ChenAlan
11 months ago |It’s the “1/24000 second” shutter speend and sync that’s clearly the most improbable (though with all due respect, not impossible… in the future) of them all that makes this a clear fake.
What I do agree with is that we’ll need a warchest of 3,000 Euros to buy the camera with all it’s other stuff that we’ll want (like lenses)
Sahaja
11 months ago |SR0
kuzlik
11 months ago |No Bayer filter, more light, cool)
Nico VG
11 months ago |My prediction :
ONE FullFrame Alpha in 2012
with a 48MP EXMOR sensor
No Foveon and no RD 175 Successor
lollo
11 months ago |This is not directed to the site owner, of course!
I’m not shooting the messenger.
But more than a leaked list of specs, it looks like a wish list from a fanboy.
JS
11 months ago |I would be happy if Sony would just announce some firm dates, I’m quite eager to move to full frame but don’t want to wait until 2013 or beyond to do so.
Clyde
11 months ago |They forgot one thing…
No FIRMWARE updates for the first three years… Oh sorry, that’s not ad hype… that’s truth. Never mind.
Tank
11 months ago |You can’t actually do IR filtering in software. Fake.
Froo
11 months ago |Depends on the sensor used. I guess you could also incorporate IR into a modified Bayer pattern, but I think those results would be ugly.
Tank
11 months ago |You also can’t have a flash sync speed that high. A shutter speed that fast would also be problematic for a focal plane shutter as well. Haven’t looked at those though.
Carl
11 months ago |It’ll use a 1/24000 leaf shutter. You read it here first, folks.
gamagama
11 months ago |i guess these are the most amusing areas:
ISO 100-102400 extendable to *204800 and 409600*
*89* cross-type points AF
60/1-*1/24000*sec, time, bulb shutter (focal plane)
and yet, no movie for flagship models?
aperture-arts.de
11 months ago |Purchased!
foreward
5 months ago |Wouldn’t an APS-C or larger 3mos make for a ginormous body?