Is the S1R worth $3,700? If you had asked me this even a month or two ago, I would have said yes. However, Sony’s incredible new 61-megapixel A7R IV has put me in a tight spot here, based on the brief look we had. For $200 less, you get a lot more, including much higher resolution, phase-detect autofocus with incredible AI powered eye detection, and video features on par with the S1R.
Sony simply hasn’t given Panasonic an inch in performance, and has a proven track record with three previous A7R models. It’s a shame, because the S1R is a pretty incredible camera, but like Canon and Nikon, Panasonic is simply getting lapped by Sony in the mirrorless race.
Here are the new 17-28mm FE tests: Ongoing review at CameraLabs.
Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD sample gallery (Dpreview).
17-28mm test at Camerastuffreview.
Full review at Mobile01.
Left: Sony a7R IV 60 megapixel photo (at 8:1). Right: Sony a7R IV 240 megapixel PixelShift photo (at 4:1). At 240 megapixels, you can see the vine is fake. I’m shook. I didn’t even notice it was fake in person. pic.twitter.com/oOyXwjxojA
The 240MP files from the A7rIV are surely going ot be stunning. Still, I wish Sony would implement an in-camera solution to elaborate the files…just like Panasonic does on their S1R! Please Sony work on that!
Even when shooting wide open the lens was sharp, and we didn’t notice any ugly onion ring bokeh, which sometimes result from aspherical lens elements, during our time with the lens. The AF is fast enough to capture the action onstage in a dimly lit venue.
Jeff Rojas tested the new Sony 35mm f/1.8 FE lens: