Six Months with the A7R2 – to Hell, then Frozen (By: Jonathan Stewart)

Guest post by Jonathan Stewart:

The first few months of my [shoplink 43671]A7R2[/shoplink] ownership were less than encouraging.  Sony’s initial pre-sale hype had me saying sayonara to my [shoplink 14165]a99[/shoplink] and most of my A-mount glass, as I pre-ordered the body, the two Batis lenses and a few Sony optics.

My a99 served me well around the world, and though not beyond the occasional niggle, was still fairly robust .  Since Sony promoted the A7 line, and the A7R2 in particular, as being weather resistant, I assumed, perhaps naively, that I was in for a durability upgrade.

After an event-free shakeout journey through Navajo Country (ah, the consummating honeymoon, I fell in love with the image quality) I began a trip through Eastern Europe to Mongolia where I would co-lead a photography tour to the Kazakh Eagle Festival in the country’s arid western Altai.  The camera performed well enough, even when adapted to A-mount glass through the LA-EA4 adapter.  But then the wind began to blow.  Despite changing lenses rarely, and only indoors, by the third day in the Altai Mountains, my shutter curtain stuck closed and the LCD froze on an error message.

Bracing for the worst, I sent the body in to Precision Camera, Sony’s notorious USA repair contractor (seriously, look them up on Yelp).  To my utter astonishment, they had my camera back to me, repaired with a new shutter, within 2 weeks, covered under warranty.   A few days later, it was off to the Peruvian Amazon to search for jaguar (success) and anaconda (sign only).  Again, the A7R2 did pretty well, surviving dripping sweat, stultifying humidity, a little bit of rain, splatters of mud – the usual.  Then, on one of the last days of the trip, I spotted a beautiful Rupicola peruvianus, Peru’s colorful and oddly-shaped national bird.  Having only the 90mm macro with me, I aimed upward, focused tightly, and ERROR.  Shutter jammed, again.  I managed to un-jam it and snap off a few pictures using silent mode, but severe frustration was setting in.

My next trip, to the Galapagos, was only 10 days away, and I considered buying a replacement body while I sent this one in for repair. But back in the dry Southern California air of my home, the issue self-resolved, so I held off on sending the body back to Precision.  In the Galapagos, the camera seized up every single morning for the first 30 minutes after leaving the air-conditioned coolness of the ship and entering the humid and warm outdoor air.  Pre-warming the camera in a plastic bag before going ashore helped, but what a hassle.  The A72 I brought along had no such issues, only the A7R2.

When I got home, I sent it in to Precision, and lobbied Sony to give me a replacement.  Precision determined, in finding water staining inside the body, that the damage was not coverable under warranty, and that the water exposure was my fault.  But the camera is advertised as weatherproof, you say?  Yes, so according to Precision Camera, the moisture had to have gotten in through an open battery or SD door.  What?  Yes, Buster, user error, now eat it.

I’m not sure how, or even if, any moisture got in there, but I assumed it was when I was hit with a downpour and quickly packed the camera away in my waterproof backpack.  No worries, I thought, I have the “New Leaf” accidental damage warranty purchased through Adorama.  Surely they’ll cover this.  Again, how naïve of me.

New Leaf refused to cover the damage as being caused by an “Act of Nature,” excluded under their coverage terms.  Spill your coffee on the camera?  No problem.  Get some rain in there?  Sorry.  Read the fine print with New Leaf.  Compared to the Squaretrade warranty sold through B&H, the New Leaf (which costs half as much), is very problematic, with excluding terms so vague and blanketing as to be applicable on a whim (Section III, excludes damages caused by “external causes of any kind”).  It’s hard to imagine accidental damages not being due to an “external cause.”  Sigh.

Fast forward to January, and I’ve got a new A7R2, boarding a plane to Alaska to photograph the aurora borealis.  Shooting the aurora is tricky because you need cloudless skies, and, good solar activity as well, a lesson I learned the hard way on two previous winter Alaska trips.  The best you can do is put yourself in a position for success, and one of the most consistently spectacular locations in the world is smack dab in the middle of the 49th state, in a place called Bettles, just north of the Arctic Circle.

The first of my three nights was a washout.  The good news was the locals thought the dense cloud cover was due to blow away by the next night, and a brisk afternoon breeze did just that.  I set up my RX100M4 to shoot a starry night time lapse, and the last few frames caught the beginning of an auroral display at around 9:00 p.m., which is early, and, say the locals, a sign of good things to come.

Using the Sony time lapse app, I shot at an 8-second interval for the next hour with my Sigma A-mount 15mm fisheye attached, stills (RAW) and movie mode.  The aurora continued to intensify, and I wanted a different perspective for my next time lapse series.  I grabbed the camera and ran into the lodge to change lenses.  Big mistake.

Outside, the temperature was -20ºF (-30ºC), and the inside of the lodge was a cozy 70º.  On my previous trip to Bettles, it was about -5ºF, and my a99 didn’t frost up when I skipped the plastic bag treatment going back into the warm lodge.  I figured it was so dry up there, relative humidity only about 5%, that I didn’t need to bother protecting my camera from condensation.

When I un-mounted the LA-EA4 and Sigma fisheye to mount my Batis 25, the sensor, exposed to the warmer, more humid interior, immediately froze, as in, was instantly covered with a lattice of delicate-looking ice crystals condensed out of the air.  All the while, the aurora continued to explode, and my past experience told me it could disappear at any time.  Not wanting to miss it, I ran to the women’s restroom (I’m no pervert, I knocked first), and used the hair drier to melt and dry up the condensation.  Within 10 seconds, all of the ice and moisture was gone, inside and out.  The Batis was mounted, and I spent the following 6 hours, plus the same the next night shooting the aurora incident free.

So aside from my dumb mistake, how did the A7R2 handle the cold?  In a word, perfectly.  Though the dials felt sticky and didn’t turn smoothly, and it seemed as though there was more latency in the LCD display, there was no loss of functionality. The interior battery didn’t last more than about 100 shots in the time lapse, which is to be expected at -30ºC.  The solution was to use a USB power source, which I hung from the tripod.  It was so cold that the USB cable felt like stiff wood, but the battery (Anker Powercore 20100mAh), insulated in a Sony lens pouch with a hand-warmer inside, performed perfectly.

I used self-adhesive hand warmers all over the A7R2 body for the hours it was outside, but I’m not sure they did any good whatsoever.  I couldn’t feel any warmth coming off of them, but that might be a function of the extreme cold.  Towards the end of shooting on both nights, the camera displayed a low-temperature warning, but in spite of that, there was no interruption in shooting.  After my initial blunder, I always bagged the camera when reentering the lodge, and changed lenses only in the cold, and then only rarely.

The upshot is I got some incredible aurora images and time lapses, and I still have a working camera.  My faith in the durability of the A7R2 is also somewhat restored.  I have many more trips planned for this year, so the experiment is by no means over.  Here’s hoping I don’t have to test New Leaf’s prickly warranty coverage again.

See most of Jonathan’s travels of the past year here, under the “Featured” tab: http://www.jonathanstewartphotos.com/

And also Jonathan’s Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/jonathan1stewart

First Sony Starvis sensor review (at minus 20 degrees Celsius)

mainvisual02

This post is more for hard-core sensor tech interested people than for classical Alpha shooters. But maybe it’s interesting for everyone to see how a Sony sensor performs at -20 degrees Celsius.

Back in October Sony posted a Brochure (PDF here) and a Slideshow (website here) explaining the detailed new Starvis tech. Well now the very first cameras using that sensor is on sale on [shoplink 44152 ebay]eBay US (Click here)[/shoplink] and [shoplink 44151 ebay]eBay DE (Click here)[/shoplink]. The “ZWO ASI 178” camera has a cooled Sony Starvis sensor which can go below ambient temperature by 35-40 degrees Celsius.

Myphotojourney posted a first impression (here) and a first review (here) of the camera with Sony sensor. Enjoy the reading!

P.S.: Would be interesting to see a -20 degree A7rII sensor test. High ISO noise should be less (on paper).

Zeiss Loxia 21mm lens review at Mirrorlessons

[shoplink 44222]Loxia21m[/shoplink]

Mirrorlessons reviewed the new [shoplink 44222]Loxia 21mm f/2.8 lens[/shoplink] and writes:

The Loxia 2.8/21 delivers exactly what you’d expect from a Zeiss lens. It is sharp at the centre, sharp in the corners, handles flare like a pro, and doesn’t show any relevant traces of CA. There is some slight vignetting at f/2.8 but it can be easily corrected with any software. As such, it doesn’t really qualify as a negative point since it happens with almost every wide angle lens. The only thing I couldn’t test because of the bad weather was coma aberration for astro images.
Of course, we could also talk about the price. This lens is not cheap by any means but if you look at the entire Zeiss catalogue, you will find that it fits in the usual price range applied to this type of lens. The Milvus lenses or old classic ZF/ZE versions are actually more expensive. So yes, the price is high but the lens delivers exactly what it promises.

Loxia 21mm store links at [shopcountry 44222]

Sony RX1R II Hands-On Field Test by TheCameraStoreTV

Our Canadian colleges from TCSTV tested the new RX1rII. They compared it with the Leica Q:

The [shoplink 44171]Leica Q[/shoplink] has a better manual focus ring and better overall handling, larger battery, higher resolution EVF.
The [shoplink 44135]RX1rII[/shoplink] is smaller and the RAW image quality is way better (better sharpness, high ISO, Dynamic range)

Overall conclusion: Chris says he likes the Leica Q better “as a camera” but the Sony is the best bang for the buck. It is the better purchase between the two.

Sony RX1rII store links to [shopcountry 44135]

First images of the first M-mount to E-mount autofocus adapter. And new videos too!

Mtech

Finally we can see the first images of (and taken with) the world’s first M-mount to E-mount autofocus adapter! A full report can be read at Advancegearbymx (google translation here). And here are some more detailed new test videos:


Techart AFM Leica M Lens AF adapter test – [shoplink 44078 ebay]Leica Summicron M 35mm f/2 (eBay)[/shoplink].


Techart AFM Leica M Lens AF adapter test – [shoplink 44079 ebay]Minolta Rokkor-M rokkor 28mm (eBay)[/shoplink].


Techart AFM Leica M Lens AF adapter test – [shoplink 44080 ebay]Zeiss Biogon 25mm f/2.8 ZM (eBay)[/shoplink].


Techart AFM Leica M Lens AF adapter test – [shoplink 44081 ebay]Angenieux 90mm f2.5 exakta mount (eBay)[/shoplink].


Techart AFM Leica M Lens AF adapter test – [shoplink 44082 ebay]Leica Summicron M 90mm f/2 (eBay)[/shoplink].

The lens will ship in late January for $349 on [shoplink 44083 ebay]eBay (auctions still not listed)[/shoplink].

New Sony Artisans tutorial videos: “Beauty Portrait” by Miguel Quiles and “A7 audio solutions” by Patrick Murphy-Racey

We got two new tutorial videos from Sony Artisans that might be very helpful for the SAR comunity:

Sony Artisan Miguel Quiles realized that video for Adorama:

“In this video you’ll learn how to use a one light setup to create a stunning beauty image. Sony Artisan of Imagery Miguel Quiles will breakdown everything you need to know, including gear, lighting, settings, and much more!”

And Patrick Murphy-Racey posted a tutorial about the audio Options for Sony Alpha:

“For a long time, my rubbermaid bin of audio gear has grown. Some of it I bought used and never even tried. In this video, I took all my stuff as well as my buddy Brian’s and we tested everything we had on the Sony A7RII. All of the equipment we tested will work with most Sony still cameras as well as some video cameras as well such as the A7, A7R, A7S, A7RII, A7SII, RX10, RX10II, A99V, A77II, AX100, AX33, etc… There are a ton of audio solutions for Sony!”